![]() ![]() (2015) “Business Research Methods” 4 th edition, Oxford University Press, p. (2012) “Research Methods for Business Students” 6 th edition, Pearson Education Limited Important elements of dissertations such as research philosophy, research design, methods of data collection, data analysis and sampling are explained in this e-book in simple words. The e-book also explains all stages of the research process starting from the selection of the research area to writing personal reflection. My e-book, The Ultimate Guide to Writing a Dissertation in Business Studies: a step by step assistance contains discussions of theory and application of research approaches. In the course of explaining ‘surprising facts’ or ‘puzzles’, the researcher can combine both, numerical and cognitive reasoning.ĭespite its increasing popularity in business studies, application of abductive reasoning in practice is challenging and you are advised to stick with traditional deductive or inductive approaches when writing your dissertation if it is the first time you are writing a dissertation… When following an abductive approach, researcher seeks to choose the ‘best’ explanation among many alternative in order to explain ‘surprising facts’ or ‘puzzles’ identified at the start of the research process. ‘Surprising facts’ or ‘puzzles’ may emerge when a researchers encounters with an empirical phenomena that cannot be explained by the existing range of theories. In abductive approach, the research process starts with ‘surprising facts’ or ‘puzzles’ and the research process is devoted their explanation. The figure below illustrates the main differences between abductive, deductive and inductive reasoning:Īt the same time, it has to be clarified that abductive reasoning is similar to deductive and inductive approaches in a way that it is applied to make logical inferences and construct theories. Abductive reasoning, as a third alternative, overcomes these weaknesses via adopting a pragmatist perspective. Inductive reasoning, on other hand, criticized because “no amount of empirical data will necessarily enable theory-building”. ![]() Specifically, deductive reasoning is criticized for the lack of clarity in terms of how to select theory to be tested via formulating hypotheses. If you see an abandoned bowl of hot soup on the table, you can use abduction to conclude the owner of the soup is likely returning soon. Abductive reasoning, also referred to as abductive approach is set to address weaknesses associated with deductive and inductive approaches. Abductive reasoning, or abduction, is making a probable conclusion from what you know. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |